Which of the following is a primary responsibility of a reviewer in the appraisal process?

Identifying the appraiser who completed the work under review is indeed a primary responsibility of a reviewer in the appraisal process. This step is essential because it helps ensure accountability and transparency within the appraisal industry. A reviewer examines the work of the appraiser to assure the quality and adherence to the relevant standards, such as the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

Knowing who performed the appraisal allows the reviewer to assess the qualifications and experience of the appraiser, and it establishes a direct line of communication for any necessary clarifications regarding the methodology or data used in the appraisal. This oversight is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the appraisal process and ensuring that appraisals are conducted according to established guidelines. It also helps clients trust that the review process is thorough and based on complete information about who prepared the original work.

In contrast, developing a new appraisal value is outside the scope of the reviewer's responsibilities, as it would involve creating a new appraisal, rather than reviewing an existing one. Providing legal advice would not typically fall under the reviewer's jurisdiction, as that requires specific legal expertise and not just appraisal knowledge. Certifying the accuracy of all appraisals is also not the reviewer's role, as the reviewer assesses the quality of the work without