The use of the jurisdictional exclusion rule in an assignment is based on what factor?

The jurisdictional exclusion rule is a concept within the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) that comes into play when a particular jurisdiction has laws or regulations that are in conflict with USPAP standards. This means that, in certain circumstances, an appraiser may be required to follow these local laws instead of the standards established by USPAP.

The correct reason for invoking this rule resides in the need for mandatory compliance. A jurisdictional exclusion is not about personal preference, but rather about adhering to the legal requirements of the jurisdiction where the appraisal is taking place. The rule allows appraisers to comply with local laws that may not align with USPAP without penalty, ensuring that they fulfill their legal obligations while still providing an appraisal that is as consistent with USPAP as possible.

Such conflicts typically arise from specific regulations that dictate how appraisals should be conducted for particular types of properties or circumstances, which can vary significantly from one area to another. Understanding this factor is essential for appraisers to navigate the complexities of compliance while maintaining their professional responsibilities. Thus, the jurisdictional exclusion is based on the necessity to meet regulatory requirements that override USPAP standards.